Comments on: uh-oh…

By: rachael

rachael — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:34:07 +0000

wait- it’s becoming a MOVIE?!?! CONGRATS! if it is… *smile*

By: Mercy

Mercy — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:12:50 +0000

He is awfully lovable, isn’t he? Too bad he’s already taken!

By: Mercy

Mercy — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:12:17 +0000

Giant nerd. You say that like it’s a bad thing.

By: Jen

Jen — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:54:54 +0000

We forget temporarily that Charlie is also a major geek, and thus wouldn’t fall into the typical Hollywood heroine stereotype to begin with. :)

By: Sara(h)

Sara(h) — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:18:53 +0000

she IS great, and actually, the guy playing opposite her is great too. buuut the script sucked. one can only do so much.

By: Hailey

Hailey — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:21:37 +0000

Leap Year. Which got totally panned, which is sad because Amy Adams is pretty much the best.

By: Hailey

Hailey — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:21:18 +0000

I totally forgot I’d referenced it before! I do indeed read the print version when I’m at home.

By: open.window

open.window — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:22:04 +0000

lol, technically he could be a high-achieving giant nerd. I’d wed Jeremy :D Its so difficult to find goodlooking history geeks these days *deep sigh*.

By: Wynne

Wynne — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:09:24 +0000

pshh… Charlie’s not the type to follow some silly Hollywood Rom-Com law… Unless it involves Clark Gable, of course.

All these New York Times references! You might be the only college student I’ve heard of besides my brother who does that. Do you like to read the print edition? If so, can my brother date you? Because he needs another New York Times junkie that’s his own age.

By: Shoe

Shoe — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:32:30 +0000

Haha, what movie was it?